Motor Vehicle Accident Personal Injury
Most drivers understand the risks of manual distractions, such as picking up a cellphone or trying to eat fast food behind the wheel. They also recognize the dangers of visual distractions, such as rubbernecking a car accident or looking at the floorboards for a dropped item. One major type of distraction most drivers do not think about, however, is cognitive. A cognitive distraction can be just as dangerous as a manual or visual one. It is your responsibility as a driver to resist cognitive distractions, for your safety and the safety of others.
A cognitive distraction is anything that takes your mind off of the driving task. Any thought, daydream or recollection that distracts you mentally from driving is a cognitive distraction. You cannot fully focus on the road when a cognitive distraction is absorbing your thoughts. The effects of a cognitive distraction are comparable to drowsy or even drunk driving.
While other types of distractions take your eyes from the road or hands from the wheel, cognitive distractions take your brain off of what you are doing. This can be extremely dangerous while driving, as even a second of delayed reaction time could be enough to cause a collision. The task of driving deserves 100% of your attention, 100% of the time.
Many different cognitive distractions can be powerful enough to cause or contribute to a car accident. Any thought, emotion, feeling, conversation, entertainment or mental diversion that detracts your focus from the road could count as a cognitive distraction.
Every driver must resist cognitive distractions while driving. Drivers must be proactive about avoiding distracted driving in all its forms. As a driver, avoid multitasking behind the wheel. Focus all your visual, manual and cognitive attention on the driving task when you drive.
If you get into a car accident with someone you believe was guilty of distracted driving, contact a personal injury attorney in Montana for assistance. Proving a cognitive distraction can be difficult, especially if the other driver will not admit fault. Unlike other forms of distracted driving, such as texting and driving, you may not have hard evidence of a cognitive distraction. Instead, your lawyer may need to make this argument based on circumstantial evidence, such as a lack of braking before impact. Not hitting the brakes could imply that something was distracting the other driver. Contact a distracted driving accident lawyer for help with your claim.
Join our community and subscribe! Sign Up for Exclusive Legal Articles and Resources.